Acrylic vs. Polycarbonate: a Quantitative and Qualitative Comparison

Acrylic often compared to Polycarbonate, which is an other transparent plastic, that is sometimes used for bearing loads. Polycarbonate is sometimes called Lexan®, which is a trademark by GE Plastics. An other popular brand name for Polycarbonate is Makrolon®, owned by Bayer. Acrylic on the other hand is often called Plexiglas. Plexiglas ® is a trademark by Roehm and Hass.

Popular Uses for Acrylic (Plexiglas):

  • Motorcycle helmet visors
  • Helicopter Windows, Submarine Windows
  • Spectator protection in ice hockey
  • Police riot control vehicles modifications
  • Swimming Pool Windows
  • Aquariums and Terariums (including large public aquarium walls and tunnels)

Popular Uses for Polycarbonate (Lexan):

  • Compact discs, DVDs
  • Lighting lenses, sun-glass/eyeglass lenses, safety glasses, automotive headlamp lenses, camper windows
  • Drinking bottles
  • Computers: Apple, Inc.’s MacBook, iMac, and Mac mini
  • Cases
  • Riot shields, visors
  • Instrument panels
  • Bullet-proof Glass

Key characteristics, Acrylic compared to Polycarbonate:

  • More likely to chip
  • less impact resistance then Polycarbonate, but still 10-24 times more resistant than float glass
  • more resistant against evenly distributed loads then Polycarbonate
  • Less likely to scratch.
  • Does NOT yellow after time.
  • Better clarity. Acrylic can be restored to optical clarity by polishing.

Key characteristics, Polycarbonate compared to Acrylic:

  • Impact/chip resistance is much higher with Polycarbonate. (about 30 times more resistant than glass)
  • More likely to scratch.
  • Substantially more expensive. (roughly 2 to 3 times)
  • Used for more industry applications
  • Bulletproof when thick enough.
  • More bendable under normal temperatures (0-20°C)
  • Yellows over time due to ultraviolet rays
  • Easier to work with (cut, less likely to break)
  • Poorer clarity, diffuses light
Polycarbonate – Lexan Acrylic – Plexiglas GS
Density g/cm³ 1.2 1.19
Max weight gain during immersion % 0.35 2.1
Tensile strength σΜ at 23°C MPa 60-70 80
Flexural strength σbB MPa 90 115
Impact strength acU (Charpy) kJ/m2 35 15
Flexural strength σbB MPa 90 115
Optical Light Transmission % 89 92
Forming Temperature °C 185…205 160…175
Vicat B Temperature °C 145 115
Velocity of Sound m/min 2270 2750
Attenuation at 5MHz dB/cm 24.9 6.4
Fire Rating German DIN 4102 B2 B2 (*2)


Lexan 9030 Sheet Product Datasheet

Plexiglas GS Product Description

(*2): Makrolon AR – Bayer Sheet Europe, October 2004

Categories: Technology of Glazing under Pressure
Created: 28 July 2014
Last Modified: 26 May 2015

Related Posts

Polishing Acrylic & Optical Distortions
Acrylic Windows with a damaged surface do not necessarily need to be replaced like float g...
Waterproofing Swimming Pools
The walls and the ground of a swimming pool are subject to constant water pressure. For...
A comparision of waterproofing slurries
Waterproofing slurries are applied directly onto the concrete This is where we used Ardex S7...
Why not to use Glass for Underwater Windows
The picture shows the two best reasons why not to use float glass for underwater windows: ...
Fire Rating of Acrylic
Both cast and extruded Acrylic burn more or less like hardwood; very little smoke generatio...
Optical Performance Requirements for Acrylic Windows
Typical optical quality in spherical sector windows. Curtesy of J.Stachiw – not our work ...

Hydrosight Underwater Windows